The Fugative

The Fugitive: Circumstantial Evidence vs. Hard Evidence In an action-packed thriller that wields every maven intensely on the edge of their seat, Dr. Ric unassailable Kimbles wife is murder in a s dealdal everyplace a bran-new drug. mold the send of events that have happened, any grounds points to Dr. Kimble. Sentenced to death, the cumulus he was on soon comes to a terrible crash, and orderly off Kimble becomes a fugitive on the run. Taking luck into his own hands, leave behind Dr. Kimble be executed, or forget he be suitable to take all of the induction preparen to him and prove his pureness?         First of all, in this characterization the guard take the precise severalise more gravely than the labored certify. When Dr. Kimble walked into his ho lend oneself on the night of the murder, he heard a struggle upstairs. He knew this wasnt a cheeseparing scene for him, save he necessitate help for his wife. When the well-grounded phi losophy arrived, they convicted Dr. Kimble too soon before they could enquire the touchable evidence of this crime and take into consideration that psyche else power have been in the house. It seems that they completely over looked that person else exponent have caused this, even though Kimble has been saying it wasnt him and he didnt lie with what the otherwise guy looked like, except he tho had one arm. It seems they were more rivet on Dr. Kimble being punishable than on fetching a real look ab give away at the embarrassing evidence everywhere, like the low-down film over and messed up room. They just assumed everything had happened. With the evidence given to the police they arrested him and sentenced him to death completely ignoring his story. It seems that they were only focalisationed on Dr. Kimble and not his story or even taking into consideration that soulfulness else could have possibly make this.         Dr. Kimble knew he was in trou ble, because he was being sentenced for a cr! ime that he did not commit. He knew no one was going to confide him, and he knew his rules were over. That all changed when a struggle on the motorcoach broke out and caused a severe accident allowing Kimble to escape. This was his chance to take his evidence that he knew of and prove his own innocence. In other oral communication take his real evidence of what he knew happened and get the police their proof of his innocence. This just would disembowel everything worse for Dr. Kimble. He was now a fugitive on the loose, and it made him appear guiltier in the rectitudes eyes. This would make things more exhausting to prove, because at this point the law doesnt care or so what he has to say and to the law this was their hard evidence that he was guilty because he was running. Kimble wasnt running though, he was purpose more hard evidence for himself, because he didnt know who the guy was, he just had an idea. This is where Dr. Kimble put all of the hard evidence unn eurotic so he could find his humanity and prove him guilty.

Kimble went at all costs on finding out the truth, where as the police just went by events that had happened. This is what the police should have done before convicting Kimble.         The setting was just mischievous for Dr. Kimble. It looked like a struggle went on, and there was a murder. He was just in the incorrectly place at the wrong time. This was specific evidence. Kimble, on the other hand seeing his wife murdered, acute it wasnt him, and knowing slightly seeing little entropy about the other guy was all an example of hard evidence. In this, you can clearly see that police ! went by the circumstances over the hard. This should not happen in a murder trial. Everything should be examined perfectly. Kimbles words should have been taken as if it were the truth.          Both circumstantial and hard evidence play a big office staff in solving a crime, but people shouldnt focus on one over the other. They should use them some(prenominal), here both sides of the story and focus on both sides of the story. Films like this whitethorn make people wonder about the law formation in todays society, but they can keep in see that this was a film, and crimes like this would most credibly be resolved the correct way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay