"Waiting for Godot": Is it useful to consider this play a comedy?

Waiting for Godot is a particularly funny play revolving nigh two seemingly homeless men who are remain for someone named Godot who, in no uncertain terms, will neer arrive. There are multiple scenes revolving around the characters, particularly estragon and Vladimir, acting out as clowns and being nonsensical, that appear to be fabricated with the sole purpose of invoking laughter. Undoubtedly, Waiting for Godot substructure be considered a comedy. However, the play is a prominent example of the substructure word of plays considered of the bailiwick of the preposterous genre. Considering this, and what the theatre of the absurd stands for (acknowledged or non), it can be said that while Waiting for Godot is a comedy, it is non necessarily useful to consider it as such. It is useful to figure many plays as comedies, if for nonhing else than to apply theories to them to further dismantle exactly why we, as human beings, laugh. Waiting for Godot is not one of them be cause none of the theories of comedy apply to it. The excerpts from Esslins book outlines the traditions typically associated with the theatre of the absurd, and Becketts play clear lies inwardly the limits. He quotes Ionesco in his introduction as saying Absurd is what which is devoid of purpose...

stillness with off from his religious, metaphysical, and transcendental roots, man is lost; all his actions puzzle senseless, absurd, useless. and this conveys the plays premise; Estragon and Vladimir continue to do things with no give tongue to or assumable purpose other than to pass the time. They are interminab ly anticipating nightfall, simply because it! marks the end of the day that they have contend out doing nothing other than waiting. While it is known that the theatre of the absurd does not claim to be conscious of its stance within its... If you want to get a full essay, target it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay